First Round Judging
Initial judging of this competition will occur during late January/early February 2026 when the finalists will be selected.
Prior to judging, the entrant will be contacted to make arrangements for the property visit. This visit will take up to three hours and will include a tour of key features. The judging will relate solely to the orchard or vegetable garden business. The Chair (or other elected representative), Supervisor and Manager are required to meet with the First Round Judges at the beginning of the visit. It is important to allocate your time wisely and to demonstrate clearly to the judges how your orchard or vegetable garden meets the judging criteria outlined below.
Each finalist will hold a field day. Guidance and financial assistance are provided to finalists to assist in staging the field day.
The judging to select the winner from the finalists will take place in late March/early April.
The process involves:
Judging will be based on:
Financial results where:
The effectiveness of the growers’ governance procedures and initiatives, in areas that include:
The organisers note that in recent times a number of new measures have been introduced to assess the performance of orchard and vegetable gardens, and other businesses. These include:
Triple Bottom Line Reporting which focuses a business on its economic value, added or lost, as well as environmental and social value. Entrants are encouraged to outline their efforts in these areas to the judges during their visits.
Cost of Production Analysis – calculating the cost of production per unit of output. This encourages the setting of goals for improved performance and allows comparisons to be made between different types of horticultural businesses.
Innovation – is the orchard or vegetable garden looking at innovative technology, processes, tools or practices or embracing new technologies that result in real financial improvements.
The judges will also look for best practice in relation to people management and career development.
A consideration in this regard is the extent to which the governance team and management encourage staff participation in the Ahuwhenua Trophy Horticulture Competition where staff meet the competition entry criteria.
In considering this the judges will utilise as a guideline the following weighting:
Criteria
|
Percent
|
Factors to be Taken into Account
|
Governance and Strategy
|
15% |
|
Social / Community / Nga Tikanga Māori
|
15% |
|
Management and Performance
|
|
|
Commitment to Sustainability and the Environment |
15% |
|
Kaitiakitanga |
10% |
|
Financial and Benchmarking |
20% |
|
Customer Focus
|
10% |
|
Human Resource and Health and Safety
|
10% |
|
Innovation |
5% |
|
Total |
100% |
|
Judges will make their decisions based on a number of factors including the points allocated in the judging criteria set out above. Accordingly, entrants need to demonstrate – both in written material supplied and in their presentation on the day – that they are performing in relation to the criteria set out in the table above.
Feedback will be given by judges to entrants on the strengths and weaknesses of the horticultural business based on the information provided and their assessments on the days of judging.
Before the judges are appointed, they are required to declare any potential conflict of interest.
Where possible the judging panel will be made up of persons who are not participating in the competition but, where this is not feasible, a judge shall not participate in judging of a property where he/she has interests associated with an entry. Likewise, judges shall not participate in the judging of the winner if they have an interest in one of the finalists. The decision of the judges is final and no correspondence will be entered into.